In a recent tweet, we linked to a story called ‘User Experience is Brand Experience‘ by Eric Karjaluoto. It’s a good read, but goes a bit narrow into User Experience (UX), specifically within the context of the web and a company’s website.
While this is important … Users can’t be confused about navigation and functionality when they get to the point of interaction with your company … the bigger point that should be reinforced is that brand is something that you may attempt to shape, but in reality is shaped by the person who is interacting with your company, be it prospect, client, or otherwise.
In the article, Karjuluoto makes an astute observation, which we’ve seen many times within the logistics and transportation market, specifically trucking:
The phrase, “we’re concerned about our brand,” is often misused. These words commonly mask a group’s real desire, which is focused on visuals. Translated to its intended meaning, this phrase might read, “make our logo bigger, and use more of our corporate color.” I might sound glib, but many would attest to the accuracy of this comment. Brand experiences are somewhat difficult notions to wrap one’s head around. As such, some mistake their visuals for their “brand.”
We’ve seen this happen before within logistics, as a ‘rebrand’ takes shape only in the colors and visuals that appear on the outward-facing elements of a company’s marketing efforts. Depth of the effort does not exceed design and stated positioning, which makes people internally feel like something’s different, but doesn’t necessarily align brand with those outside the company’s walls.
Karjuluoto is right in his argument that User Experience greatly influences brand, but we’ll expand that argument for the moment. In fact, the argument needs to be expanded not only to how customers interact with your company, but how you are perceived and how your vision is communicated when you ‘are marketing’ and when you are not. (In other words, you ‘are marketing’ at all times.)
Absolutely and emphatically, a brand should be represented visually the way that you want it to be perceived. And a good partner in such an effort should be experienced in helping you define and execute such visuals. But the feeling that those visuals generates needs to be backed up in everything that takes place within and outside of your company’s walls from how your employees treat one another to how your customers’ invoices appear and their accuracy. Commitment to the visual component is only dipping your toe in the water … Not likely to cause the tidal wave of value you’re hoping for. Company’s who understand the power of brand value know that full commitment is the only way to succeed, and they also understand that brand value success translates directly to profit success.
So how do you ensure continuity? Simple. Get out of your shell and encourage others to do so as well. Ask people to interact with your company as a prospect, a customer, or as an employee might, both as a first-timer and someone who has known you for a while. Don’t direct them. Don’t tell them what you’re looking for, at least to start. Let them (and you … very importantly you) report their findings without fear of reproach toward them or anyone they may encounter. If something is incongruent to your brand position within the process, fix it by teaching, not by command and control. Chances are people don’t understand the importance of their cohesive action on your brand and it’s up to senior leadership to get them to.
The key is to make sure that what you are trying to communicate in your visuals and marketing is real throughout the entirety of a customer/employee/prospect experience.
A quick example might help: As designers, we’re of course hardcore Apple users. Always have been. Recently, we had to upgrade a computer, but were on the road within the time frame we thought we were allotted to be able to do so. When we called into alert Apple of our situation, we expected a certain ‘experience.’ We did not get it. In fact, we got the opposite. Very much the opposite. No visuals, no intentional or ‘marketing’ branding going on … just an interaction and policy discussion that made us wonder if Apple was turning into a company we no longer recognized (or appreciated). Their usual ‘let’s figure this out’ attitude was replaced with a ‘you should read your entire receipt’ mindset typically reserved for the painful experience of deactivating a gym membership.
We were so put off by the experience that we called the national care line (yes, it’s called something like that) not out of concern that they wouldn’t bend on the policy, but because our experience was so out of kilter with the Apple brand. We wanted to know if this was how things were going to go from now on, so we could act and choose our equipment accordingly.
Fortunately, the person we spoke to resolved our issues and even spoke to our original contact on the phone to understand what was going on. When he hung up with her (we were on the line, too), he mentioned off-hand that they would need to ‘talk’ again … meaning that as peers, he did not appreciate her bending Apple’s care reputation to the level she had. All was fixed and our perception of Apple is as it was … good. In fact, even better, because we saw something amazing in action … employees making sure that they hold one another to standards fully in line with the brand expectations Apple has defined.
Can you say the same about your company? Do your employees know the type of business you’re trying to project, all the way through the organization to call centers?
For starters, you’ve got to define your brand. And without question, you must visualize it through a partner who is capable of helping you express your brand through marketing. But creating a brand that people understand and value has to take the thinking behind your outward appearance and infuse it into every corner of your business, whether ‘marketing’ or not. Visualizing is an important step, but it should be a springboard – not the entirety – of your brand efforts.